<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Mario Galaxy 2 &amp; Metroid: Other M&#8230;.THIS SUMMER?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamerroad.com/super-mario-galaxy-2-metroid-other-m-this-summer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamerroad.com/super-mario-galaxy-2-metroid-other-m-this-summer/</link>
	<description>Video Gaming, Computer Gaming and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.gamerroad.com/super-mario-galaxy-2-metroid-other-m-this-summer/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamerroad.com/?p=6137#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Well, they havent announced any E3 plans so there may be a chance for huge surprises, but itll mainly be about Zelda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they havent announced any E3 plans so there may be a chance for huge surprises, but itll mainly be about Zelda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LilCargo</title>
		<link>http://www.gamerroad.com/super-mario-galaxy-2-metroid-other-m-this-summer/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>LilCargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamerroad.com/?p=6137#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>yeah, what about post 2010? There may be reason for concern here...it does seem vaguely desperate of them. Well, we&#039;ll just have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, what about post 2010? There may be reason for concern here&#8230;it does seem vaguely desperate of them. Well, we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

